← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/20891/2020allowed

Gokul v. State Rep By Inspector Of Police

2020-12-30Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.12.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No.20891 of 2020 1.Gokul ... Petitioners 2.Gopi 3.Rajendiran 4.Poovi Vs.

The State rep. by

...Respondent

The Inspector of Police Barur Police Station Krishnagiri District.

Crime No.713 of 2020.

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.713 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Muzammil Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 447 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act 2002, in Crime No.713 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant and the petitioners are neighbours. On the date of occurrence, during the wordy quarrel, the petitioners abused and attacked the de-facto complainant with hands and legs and also threatened him with deadly weapons.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the victim has been discharged from the hospital. Investigation almost completed.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and except the offence under Section 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act 2002, other offences are bailable in nature and investigation almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 30/12/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE POCHAMPALLI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BARUR POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. E.KANNADASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.20891/2020 Date :30/12/2020 TA-25/01/2021