← Library
Madras High CourtWP/12955/2006closed

D.Ravi v. State Of Tamilnadu

2015-02-25Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.02.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.12955 of 2006 D.Ravi

...Petitioner

-vs1. State of Tamilnadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government (Home), Fort St. George, Chennai.

2. The Inspector General of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Government Estate, Madras.

3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, EOW II, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai-16.

4. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Erode.

5. Union of India, rep. by the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus commanding the fifth respondent to conduct a comprehensive time-bound investigation into the multicrore Tamil Nadu Police Fake Deposit Receipt Scam and monitor the same, in the light of the shocking details narrated.

For Petitioner : Mr.Manikandan Vathan Chettiar For Respondents : Mr.STS.Moorthy Government Pleader for R1 to R4

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner has originally preferred the petition as Public Interest Litigation seeking a comprehensive time-bound investigation into what is alleged as multi-crore Tamil Nadu Police Fake Deposit Receipts Scam. It is the case of the petitioner that he had come across innumerable instances of Fake Deposit Receipts fabricated by the Police and the values inflated by means of innumerable bogus charge sheets and extortion resorted to by the Police officers.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that trial of the case was to commence in Coimbatore couple of years back, but he is not aware of the stage of the case. Petitioner has also not made an endeavour to follow up the matter and thus, we are of the view that continuation of this Public Interest Litigation would serve no purpose, when trial has proceeded.

3. Writ petition, accordingly, stands closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bbr To

1. The Secretary to Government (Home), Fort St. George, Chennai.

2. The Inspector General of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Government Estate, Madras.

3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, EOW II, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai-16.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Erode.

5. The Director, Union of India, Central Bureau of Investigation, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.

1 CC to the Government Pleader, SR.No. 10438 W.P.No.12955 of 2006 MP (CO) PSI (12.03.2015)