Sheak Abdhullah v. State Rep By

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 of IPC in Crime No.132 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that while the defacto complainant standing before the ATM Centre to deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- in the CDM machine, some unknown persons assaulted the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/-. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

1/3

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that while the defacto complainant standing before the ATM Centre to deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- in the CDM machine, some unknown persons assaulted the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/-. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel and also the serious offence committed by the petitioner this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 29.08.2022 vv 2/3

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Vv 29.08.2022 3/3