← Library
Madras High CourtWMP/26140/2021dismissed

Archunan v. The Chief Secretary To

2025-01-02Honourable Mr Justice S. S. Sundar,Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-01-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN WMP No. 26140 of 2021 IN REV.APLW SR No. 97111 OF 2021

1. Archunan

2. Ealmurugan 3.Babou Petitioners Vs

1. The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.

2.The Inspector General of Police Police Department, Puducherry.

3.The Under Secretary to Government (Home) Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.

4.The Director General of Police, Police Department, Puducherry.

5.The Superintendent of Police (HO) Police Department, Puducherry.

6. S.Rajesh

7. S.Ramesh 8.D.Venkatesha Perumal

9.S.Velu 10.M.Murugan 11.A.Govindaraj 12.E.Punitharaja 13.B.Vibulkumar 14.Badugu Kanaka Rao 15.E.Prabu 16.K.Priya 17.M.Saranya 18.R.Akalya 19.S.Sathya 20.Jerome Jasmond 21.S.Balaji 22.M.Kumaravel 23.Muruganandam 24.V.Sivakumar 25.N.Santhose 26.M.Senthil Kumar 27.Jayagunathan 28.V.Shamala 29.P.ivaprakash 30.M.Suresh 31.D.Murugan 32.G.Santhose 33.G.Kalaiyarajan 34.A.Zaguir Qussene 35.K.Rajasekar 36.M.Mohamad Sheck Alavudeen 37.U.Vijayakumar 38.A.Anusha Basha

39.S.Veeraputhiran 40.S.Nandhakumar 41.A.Shanmuga Sathiya 42.M.Ilango 43.C.Mariya Francisca 44.B.Mali 45.Pramod Kayanadath

...Respondents

Prayer in WMP.No. 26140 of 2021 : Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay of 1401 days in filing the review application.

Prayer in Rev.Aplw SR.No. 97111/2021 : Review application filed under Order 47 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of CPC to review the order passed in W.P.No. 13021/2016 dated 22.11.2017 by allowing the writ petition as prayer for.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Mohan, Senior Counsel For Respondent(s): Mr. R. Syed Mustafa Spl Gp [ Pondy ] For R1 & 3

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.) Today this Miscellaneous Petition is listed under the caption 'For being mentioned'.

2. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the earlier review application filed by the petitioner to review the order passed in W.P. No. 13021 of 2016, dated 22.11.2017 was dismissed by this Court.

3. In light of the above, the present petition seeking to review the same order of this Court, is not maintainable. Consequently, the present miscellaneous petition, which seeks to condone a delay of 1401 days in filing the second review application, cannot be entertained and is liable to be dismissed.

4. Accordingly, the present miscellaneous petition is dismissed. Consequently, the review application is rejected at the SR stage. Although this Court had earlier dismissed the petition on 02.01.2025 on other grounds, the reasons for dismissal shall now be read in conjunction with the reasons stated in the preceding paragraphs. (S.S.SUNDAR., J.) (RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN., J.) 21-01-2025 ak

S.S.SUNDAR, J.

and RMT. TEEKA RAMAN, J.

ak WMP.No. 26140 of 2021 in Rev.Aplw.SR.No.97111 of 2021 21.01.2025