Krishnasamy v. The State Rep.By Its

Crl.O.P.No.20927 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No.20927 of 2020 1.Krishnasamy 2.Rasavel .. Petitioners Vs.

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Andimadam Police Station, Ariyalur District.

.. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No. Not Known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police station. For Petitioners : Mr.T.Meganathan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohammed Muzammil Government Advocate

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No. Not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.O.P.No.20927 of 2020 G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

arb/tta 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the enquiry against the petitioners is pending in C.S.R.No.1140 of 2020. 4.The petitioners are directed to co-operate with the enquiry. During the enquiry, the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioners.

5. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with the above observation and direction.

30.12.2020 arb/tta Internet: Yes/No Index:Yes/No To The Inspector of Police, Andimadam Police Station, Ariyalur District.

Crl.O.P.No.20927 of 2020 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/