P.Palanisamy, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition No.17014 of 2010 P.Palanisamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector Tirupur.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Tirupur, Tirupur - District.

3. The Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Mulanur Police Station, Tirupur - District.

... Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to release the Tempo Traveler bearing Registration No. TN 34 - 3456 seized by the 3rd respondent on 11.05.2010, to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balachandran For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh, Addl. Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar drl To

1. The District Collector Tirupur.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Tirupur, Tirupur - District.

3. The Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Mulanur Police Station, Tirupur - District.

+1cc to Mr.D.Balachandran, Advocate sr.no.36426 +1cc to Government Advocate sr.no.37519 W.P.No.17014 of 2010 nr 13/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/