← Library
Madras High CourtTCA/1174/2010dismissed for not pressed

Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Ambadi Enterprises

2016-01-22Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala,Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.1.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tax Case Appeal No.1174 of 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.

.. Appellant

Versus

M/s.Ambadi Enterprises, No.43, "Parry House", 5th Floor, Moore Street, Chennai 600 001.

.. Respondent Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `D' Bench, Chennai dated 18.06.2010, in I.T.A.No.300/Mds/2009(Assessment year 20042005) against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VII, Chennai, dated 31.12.2008 and made in ITA No.54/07-08 against the assessment order of Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle 1(1), Chennai dated 26.12.2006 for the year 04-05.

For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.M.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman

O R D E R

The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is less than Rs.20,00,000/-.

2. The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lan/cla To:

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `D' Bench.

2. The Asst. Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IV Floor, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai.

3. The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chennai.

4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VIII, Chennai.

5. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle 1(1), Chennai.

+ 1 cc to Mr.T. Ravikumar, Advocate SR.4690 + 1 cc to M/s. Subharaya, Advocate SR.39314 + 1 cc to Mr.R.Sivaraman, Advocate SR 4714[4/5/16] Tax Case Appeal No.1174 of 2010 KSJ(CO) EU 02.02.16 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/