C.Rajan v. The Chief Engineer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.Rajan ...
Petitioner versus 1.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resource Organization, Chennai Region, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
2.The Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Parabikulam Aliyar Project, Aliyar Basin Division Pollachi, Coimbatore District - 642 127.
3.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Valaparai Taluk, Valaparai, Coimbatore District - 642 127.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD, Public Works Department, 1/5
Keezh Neerar Dam, Sub Division Valparai, Coimbatore District - 642 127.
5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD, Sholayar Basin Division, Valparai, Coimbatore District - 642 125.
...
Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th and 5th respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization of service on completion of 10 years as Daily Wage employee in PWD, with effect from his initial date of appointment, without any break in service, confer all the monetary benefits and all other consequential benefits dated 27.09.2021. For Petitioner :
Mr.S.Saravanan For Respondents :
Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 4 and 5 to consider his claim for regularisation of service on completion of 10 years as Daily Wage employee in P.W.D. with all monetary benefits.
2.
Heard Mr.S.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.H.Ravikumar, learned Government Advocate for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.
2/5
3.
Mr.K.H.Ravikumar, learned Government Advocate for the respondents submitted that the respondents had considered the representation of the petitioner and passed orders on 03.05.2018 by stating that the petitioner did not give any proof to show that he was serving continuously for 10 years.
4.
The petitioner has not chosen to challenge the said order dated 03.05.2018 but filed a simple writ of mandamus as though he has produced the proof to show that he was in continuous service for more than 10 years. Hence, this Writ Petition is disposed. No costs. 20.03.2024 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No sri 3/5
To 1.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resource Organization, Chennai Region, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
2.The Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Parabikulam Aliyar Project, Aliyar Basin Division Pollachi, Coimbatore District - 642 127.
3.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Valaparai Taluk, Valaparai, Coimbatore District - 642 127.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD, Public Works Department, Keezh Neerar Dam, Sub Division Valparai, Coimbatore District - 642 127.
5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD, Sholayar Basin Division, Valparai, Coimbatore District - 642 125.
4/5
R.N.MANJULA , J.
sri 20.03.2024 5/5