K. Dhanalakshmi v. Arulmighu Dharmaraja Temple

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.9.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.A.No.1150 of 2016

1. K.Dhanalakshmi

2. K.Vasantha

3. K.Devi

4. K.Pushpalatha

5. K.B.Rajendran Appellants

Versus

1. Arulmighu Dharmaraja Temple rep. by its Dharmakartha/Fit Person, O.No.12, N.No.18, Evening Bazaar Road, Chennai 600 003.

2. M.D.Kasthuri

3. M.D.G.Rajkumar

4. M.D.Balaji

5. The District Collector of Chennai, Collectorate, Singaravelan Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

6. The Tahsildar, Fort-Tondiarpet Taluk, (Now Purasaiwakkam Taluk), Chennai 600 003.

7. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003.

8. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, N.H.Road, Chennai 600 034.

9. The Deputy Commissioner, (Now the Joint Commissioner), Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, N.H. Road, Chennai 600 034.

Respondents

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 15.7.2016 passed in W.P.No.9691 of 2011 on the file of this court.

WP No.9691/2011:

Writ petition praying to writ of Mandamus directing the 5th respondent herein to pass necessary urgent orders in file No.J1/ 48896/2007 and also direct the 7th 8th and 9th respondents herein to pass necessary Urgent modifications are to be carried out in the respective revenue records infavour of the 1st respondent herein inrespect of the list of properties set out in the order dt.20.12.1973 in C.S.No.140 of 1936 and C.S.No.414 of 1881 on the file of the High Court of Madras and in Case No.26113/ Enquiry/ 2007 order dt.10.1.2008 and Case No.4453/ Enquiry/2007 dt.25.7.2007 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission Chennai. For appellant : Mr.K.B.Rajendran For R5 & R6 : Mr.O.Selvam, Govt. Advocate For R7 : Mr.K.Soundararajan For R8 & R9 : Mr.R.P.Prathap, Special Govt. Pleader

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the court was made by S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.) There is neither interim order nor final order passed by the learned Single Judge except an observation made by the learned Single Judge, as could be seen from paragraphs 2 and 3 of the order, to the effect that R.C.A.No.364 of 2007 is pending on the file of the Court of Small Causes, Chennai for nearly ten years and a direction to the Registry to call for a report from the said court as to the reasons for such pendency.

2. Since there is no order to be challenged by way of writ appeal, we find no merit in the writ appeal and accordingly, it is dismissed. The petitioners sought for expeditious disposal of the writ petition. They can seek for the same before the learned Single Judge in the pending proceedings and it is for the learned Single Judge to consider the same. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

ssk.

To:

1. The District Collector of Chennai, Collectorate, Singaravelan Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

2. The Tahsildar, Fort-Tondiarpet Taluk, (Now Purasaiwakkam Taluk), Chennai 600 003.

3. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003.

4. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, N.H.Road, Chennai 600 034.

5. The Deputy Commissioner, (Now the Joint Commissioner), Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, N.H. Road, Chennai 600 034.

1 cc to Mr.Soundararajan, Advocate, sr.52953 1 cc to Mr.K.B.Rajendran, Advocate, sr.52722 2 ccs to Government Pleader, sr.52802 & 52665 W.A.No.1150 of 2016 mg co kra 19.10.2016