Madras High CourtCRL OP/20553/2021dismissed

Surya v. State Rep By The

2021-11-01Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of November Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20553 of 2021 1 SURYA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 NITHYANANTHAM @ NITHYA 3 LOGESH Vs STATE REP BY THE [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 291/2021 For Petitioner : M/S. R. RAJKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.291 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners tried to prevent the local temple festival and thereby abused the defacto complainant in filthy languages. It is further alleged that the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant, due to which the defacto complainant sustained injuries. Based on the complainant lodged by the defacto complainant, the Law Enforcing Agency registered a case against the petitioners.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that there are five previous cases similar in nature pending against the petitioners. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the allegation level against the petitioners and also considering that there are five previous cases similar in nature pending against petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 01/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. R. RAJKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.20553/2021 Date :01/11/2021 INBA-18/11/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/