← Library
Madras High CourtWP/27176/2010disposed of

D.Parthasarathy, v. The Chairman,

2018-06-26Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.27176 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010 D.Parthasarathy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai - 600 002.

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, West Mambalam - I, Section No.113, K.R.Koil Street, Chennai - 600 033.

3.D.Sreenivasan 4.D.Shanthi 5.D.Thulasi ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to shift the electricity board on the meter connection bearing service No.224:013:93 from the premises of the fourth respondent to the outside wall of the premise bearing No.57/25, Jubilee Road, West Mambalam, Chennai-33. For Petitioner : Mr.M.V.Deenadhayalan For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.R.Dilipkumar

ORDER

The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus, directing the second respondent to shift the electricity meter bearing service connection No.224:013:93 from the premises of the fourth respondent to the outside wall of the premises at No.57/25, Jubilee Road, West Mambalam, Chennai-33. 2.However, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the respondent Electricity Board fairly submitted that due to the pendency of the suit in O.S.No.5845 of 2007 before the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, the request of the petitioner has not been considered by the respondent Electricity Board. The learned counsel further https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

submitted that if a fresh representation is submitted by the petitioner, the same will be considered by the respondent Electricity Board on merits and in accordance with law, which has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation enclosing all the required documents to the respondent Electricity Board along with a copy of this order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such submission, the respondent Electricity Board is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereafter.

4.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar drl To 1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai - 600 002.

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, West Mambalam - I, Section No.113, K.R.Koil Street, Chennai - 600 033.

+1cc to Mr.M.V.Deenadhayalan, advocate sr.no.40854 W.P.No.27176 of 2010 nr 20/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/