Madras High CourtWP/22639/2024withdrawn dismissed

A.Dhanapal v. The District Collector

2024-08-09Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.08.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P. No.24670 of 2024 A. Dhanapal ....

Petitioner

Versus

1. The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam.

2. The Assistant Director, The Fisheries Department, Nagapattinam,

3. The Block Development Officer, Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam.

4. The Tahsildar, Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam.

5. The Inspector of Police, Voimedu Police Station, Vedharanyam Taluk, 1/6

6. The Inspector of Police, Vedaranyam Police Station,

7. The Village Panchayath President, Kodiyakkadu Village,

9. The Village Panchayath President, Panchanathikulam Middle Village,

10. The Village Panchayath President, Panchanathikulam West Village,

11. The Village Panchayath President, Thennadar Village,

12. The Village Panchayath President, Voimedu Village,

13. The Village Panchayath President, Annapettai Village, Vedaranayam Taluk, Nagapatttianm District.

14. The Village Panchayath President, Kadinalvayal Village, ...

Respondents 2/6

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st to 6th respondents to take steps and restrain the 7th to 14th respondents from disturbing the fishing rights of the petitioner in the lagoon situated to the Northern side of the Mannavaram Island and extends for a length of 30 Km between the west side of Kodiyakkadu and the Valavanar River as common to the people of every village in that locality based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.07.2024.

For Petitioner : Ms.K. Viji For Respondents :Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Special Government Pleader for R3, 7 to 14 Mr.G. Krishna Raja, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1, 2 and 4 Mr.L. Baskaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R5 and R6.

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.

2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, 3/6

liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

09.08.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2 To