Valli v. The State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of November Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20606 of 2021 1 VALLI [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 DEVI Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDUMALAIPETTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT CRIME NO.1280 OF 2021 For Petitioners : M/S.J.ASOKAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 341 & 307 of IPC in Cr.No.1280 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute, there arose a wordy quarrel between the de-facto complainant and petitioners and the petitioners have attacked the de-facto complainant using Aruvamanai, and in the said attack, the de-facto complainant sustained grievous injuries Hence, the Law Enforcing Agency registered a case against the petitioners.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl side) submits that injured person has been discharged from the hospital. He opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No:II, Udumalaipettai, Tiruppur District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further order;
(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 01/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, UDUMALAIPETTAI, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUPPUR [FOR INFORMATION].
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDUMALAIPETTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S.J.ASOKAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.12341 CRL OP.20606/2021 Date :01/11/2021 JPA 17/11/2021