D.Lakshmi v. The State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 11.04.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU HCP No.713/2016 D.Lakshmi ..
Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector of Police Kelayur Police Station, Kelayur.
2.D.Manikandan 3.Veeradoss 4.Renuka .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the daughter of the petitioner namely Nithya, aged about 20 years, before this Court and set her at liberty forthwith.
For Petitioner :
Mr.T.Seenivasasn For R1 :
Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran Addl. Public Prosecutor
ORDER
[Order of the court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J.,] This Habeas Corpus Petition, has been filed by the petitioner herein, who is the mother of the detenue, praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to produce her daughter, Nithya, aged about 20 years, who is said to be in the illegal custody of the respondents 2 to 4 herein, before this Court and to set her at liberty.
Heard the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
The petitioner had stated that her daughter, namely, Nithya, aged about 20 years, had completed D.T.Ed. Course and she has been missing from 21.02.2016 and that, she had been taken away by the respondents 2 to 4, along with 20 sovereigns of gold and Rs.30,000/- in cash. Therefore, the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 1st respondent police on 25.03.2016 and the said complaint has been registered as a case in Cr.No.51/2016 on the same day, as a "woman missing" case. As the 1st respondent had not taken effective steps to trace the detenue, the petitioner is before this Court with this petition.
Today, when the matter had been listed for admission, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent, has stated that the detenue, Nithya, had eloped with the 2nd respondent herein and had got married, on 08.03.2016. The said marriage had also been registered before the Sub Registrar, Thirukuvalai, in Nagapattinam District. He had also produced a copy of the Certificate of Registration of Marriage dated 08.03.2016 before this Court.
In such circumstances, we are of the considered view that no further orders are necessary in this petition. Accordingly, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar AP To 1.The Inspector of Police Kelayur Police Station Kelayur.
2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.
1 cc to Mr.T.Seenivasan, Advocate, sr.22839 HCP.No.713/2016 ca co kra 01.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/