Dinesh v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of November Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20582 of 2021 1 DINESH [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 PRAKASH Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEEDAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT.
CR.NO. 641 OF 2021.
For Petitioner : M/S. V.CHELLAMMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking anticipatory bail for the alleged offences under Section 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.641 of 2021.
2.The learned Government Advocate submitted that the offence mentioned in the FIR is only bailable offence. Hence, granting anticipatory bail doesn't arise.
3.The above submission made by the learned Government Advocate is recorded and accordingly, this petition seeking anticipatory bail is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to work out their remedy in accordance with law.
-sd/- 01/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEEDAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S. V.CHELLAMMAL Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.12436 CRL OP.20582/2021 Date :01/11/2021 INBA-10/11/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/