The Commissioner And Another v. R.Elangovan And 7 Others

A.No.3093 of 2025 in C.S..No.67 of 2022 K.KUMARESH BABU,J.

This application has been filed to condone the delay in receiving the documents filed by the applicants/ defendants 5 & 6 in the above captioned suit.

2. Mr.K.Chandrasekaran learned counsel for the respondents 1 & 2 would submit that he has no objection in allowing the present application but subject to its admissibility, proof and relevancy.

3. Heard both sides.

Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 has no objection in allowing the present application and being satisfied with the same, the application is ordered as prayed for and the delay is condoned. The learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to receive the documents subject to its admissibility, proof and relevancy. Gba 11.07.2025 (1/2) Page No. 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis