Commission Of Income Tax v. Shri Sushil Kumar Forma Ind
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.01.2016
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA T.C.A.NO.339 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai.
... Appellant/Appellant Vs.
Late Smt.Santyawanti Devi Fomra L/R. Shri Sushil Kumar Fomra, New No.261, Old No.126, Mint Street, Chennai - 600 079.
... Respondent/Respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order dated 27.3.2009 in I.T.A.No.1111/Mds/2008 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench in respect of the assessment year 2001-2002 and against the Order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-IV, Chennai made in Appeal No.CIT(A)- IV/CHE/780/06/07, dated 08.02.2008 for the Assessment Year 200102 and against the Assessment Order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-XII, Chennai 600 006 made in PAN/GIR No.AAAPF263613, dated 29.12.2006 for the Assessment Year 2001-02. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar, Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar and Mr.M.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.T.N.Seetharaman
JUDGMENT
Judgment of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is less than Rs.20,00,000/-.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lan To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Madras.
2. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) - IV, Chennai-34,
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle XII, Chennai - 600 006.
+1cc to Mr.T.N.Seetharaman, Advocate, S.R.No.3464 T.C.A.No.339 of 2010 BVR(CO) CA(18/04/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/