← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/814/2016dismissed

L.Veeraraghavan @ Raghavan v. State Rep By

2016-09-30Honourable Mr Justice P. Kalaiyarasan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-09-2016

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.814 of 2016 L.Veeraraghavan @ Raghavan .... Petitioner vs.

State rep.by

1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City Egmore, Chennai-8

3. The Inspector of Police T.15, S.R.M.C.Police Station Porur, Chennai 116 ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of habeas corpus calling for the records in Memo No.187/BCDFGISSSV/2016 dated 24.2.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to produce the detenu Saranraj, aged 26 years, who is now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.C.Durairaj For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, APP

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records relating to detention order, dated 24.02.2016, passed in No.187/BCDFGISSSV/2016 dated 24.2.2016, by the detaining authority, who has been arrayed as the second respondent herein, against the detenu, by name Saranraj, son of Veeraraghavan and quash the same.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has represented that the detention order in question has already been revoked by the Government of Tamil Nadu, by virtue of G.O.Rt.No.2219, dated 18.05.2016, and a copy of the same has been submitted for perusal and actually this Court has perused the same and found that the detention order in question has already been revoked.

3. Considering the aforesaid factual circumstances, the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous. In fine, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed. (A.S.J.) (P.K.J.) 30.09.2016

To

1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City Egmore, Chennai-8

3. The Inspector of Police T.15, S.R.M.C.Police Station Porur, Chennai 116 4.The Superintendent of Police Central Prison,Puzhal, Chennai 5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

A.SELVAM,J.

AND P.KALAIYARASAN,J.

msk H.C.P.No. 814 of 2016 30.09.2016