← Library
Madras High CourtWP/31719/2003dismissed as infructuous

G.Marimuthu v. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

2017-12-08Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.12.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.31719 of 2003 and W.M.P.No.35806 of 2003 G.Marimuthu ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government Law Departments, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Virudhunagar Dt.

Virudhunagar.

3.K.Nallathambi 4.K.Raju 5.Mangalasamy ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Declaration to declare the continuance of the 3rd respondent in the office of the Public Prosecutor Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur as illegal.

For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.M.Elumalai, Govt. Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.A.Jenasenan for R5 Dismissed as against R3&R4 vide order dated 05.08.2011

ORDER

The prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is for a Writ of Declaration, declaring the continuance of the 3rd respondent in the office of the Public Prosecutor, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, as illegal.

2.When the case was called on 07.12.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it is posted today. Even today when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Mr.M.Elumalai, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Mr.A.Jenasenan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.5 would submit that the issue raised in this Writ Petition has become infructuous as the 3rd respondent is no more continuing in the office of the District Public Prosecutor and hence, the very prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is not required to be adjudicated any more.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the issue raised in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and no further adjudication is required, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar speaking order /non speaking order mps To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Law Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Virudhunagar Dt. at Virudhunagar.

sm:1.2.2018 W.P.No.31719 of 2003 and W.M.P.No.35806 of 2003 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/