← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/21164/2024disposed of

S.Irudayaraj v. The Superintendent Of Police

2024-09-02Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.09.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN S.Irudayaraj ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Police Training College, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Tambaram.

3.The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing Police Training College, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083 Crime No.33 of 2023 ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, pleased to direct the 1st respondent to conduct further investigation and to take necessary action on the petitioner's complaint dated 20.06.2024 and include the petitioner in the list of victim witness and record his statement under Section 180 of BNSS in Crime No.33 of 2023 on the file of the 3rd respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.L.Mahendran For Respondent : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan 1/4

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner herein based on advertisement had invested Rs.10 lakhs in the company by name M/s.Agrotech Integrated Farmer Co.Ltd. He was allured by promise that he will be getting return of Rs.30 lakhs and interest of Rs.37,500/- per mensum. Since he has not received the promised return, he has lodged a complaint.

2.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submits that on an identical complaint given by Sadam Hussain, case in Crime No.33 of 2023 was registered by the CCB, Tambaram, who is the 2nd respondent herein. The complaint of this petitioner was also taken into consideration and based on his statement as one of the victim in the crime, he has been arrayed as LW.33 and final report filed before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu on 10.04.2024.

3.

From the statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), it is clear that the grievance of the petitioner been redressed by the Investigating Officer and he has been as one of the 2/4

witnesses and support the case of the prosecution against the alleged perpetrator of crime. Therefore, the direction sought in this Criminal Original Petition is not sustainable. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

02.09.2024 Index : Yes/No rpl To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Police Training College, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Tambaram.

3.The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing Police Training College, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

3/4

rpl 02.09.2024 4/4