Avaranam v. The Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.11.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.26918 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 Avaranam

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The Collector, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2.The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Mangalur, Cuddalore District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or any other direction to call for the records and to quash the impugned retirement order Na.Ka.P.T.1/272/2012 dated 26.04.2012 issued by the respondents. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Government Advocate

O R D E R

When the writ petition was listed for hearing on 15.11.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Hence, the same was posted under the caption "for dismissal" on 16.11.2017. Today(16.11.2017), when the writ petition was taken up for hearing under the same caption, none represented on behalf of the writ petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Thus, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for Nonprosecution. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sji To 1.The Collector, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2.The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Mangalur, Cuddalore District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.

W.P.No.26918 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 RRK(06/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/