Velusamy v. The Principal District Judge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.02.2014

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P. No.2706 of 2013 Velusamy

...Petitioner

vs.

The Principal District Judge Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District The Chief Judicial Magistrate Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to sanction the pension and disburse the legal dues i.e., GPF, Gratuity, DCRG and family benefit fund, etc. in accordance with VI Pay Commission recommendations and pay interest of 12% per annum for the belated payment, within a reasonable time.

For petitioner :

No appearance For respondents :

Mr. R. Tholgappian

ORDER

Today, when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was passed over. When the matter was called later, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) Dated :04.03.2014 //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Principal District Judge Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District The Chief Judicial Magistrate Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District W.P. No.2706 of 2013 MG (CO) JJM (05/03/2014) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/