Madras High CourtCRL OP/20851/2021dismissed

Shameema v. The State Rep.By

2021-11-11Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice TV. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20851 of 2021 SHAMEEMA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J-3, GUINDY POLICE STATION, (CRIME DIVISION), CRIME NO.773/2021.

For Petitioner : M/S. S.S.SANTHOSA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Counsel for Government Advocate, (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conferencing) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.773 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had cheated the defacto complainant by giving false promise to get a job in Poland. Hence, this complaint has been lodged by the defacto complainant.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the defacto complainant approached the defacto complainant for arranging tourist visa and on receiving the money from the defacto complainant, the petitioner arranged tourist visa for the defacto complainant and his mother and they sent to Poland and hence, she is nothing to do with the alleged offence and she has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no previous case against the petitioner. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) raised objections and submitted that this is a case for job rocking. The petitioner had received a sum of Rs.4,80,000/- from the defacto complainant by giving a false promise to get job at Poland, thereby cheated the defacto complainant. The money has not been recovered and the investigation is not yet completed and there is no previous case against the petitioner.

5.Considering the gravity of the offence that by giving false promise that he should get the job at Poland, the petitioner cheated a sum of Rs.4,80,000/- from the defacto complainant and taking note of the fact that the money has not been recovered and the investigation is not yet completed, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 11/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J-3, GUINDY POLICE STATION, (CRIME DIVISION) 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. S.S.SANTHOSA KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.20851/2021 Date :11/11/2021 RW 16/11/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/