← Library
Madras High CourtTCA/775/2010dismissed for not pressed

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Y.Anandkumar,

2016-01-22Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala,Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.1.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tax Case Appeal No.775 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax Ward X(2),Chennai ... Appellant

Versus

Y.Anandkumar L/H Late Y.Jagannathan 1/237, B, Pollachi Road, Industrial Estate, Coimbatore ... Respondent Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `B' Bench, Chennai, dated 20.11.2009, in I.T.A.No.1248/Mds/2009. Against the Order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) IV, Chennai 34 dated 17.06.2009 and made in CIT(A) No.IV/Che/687/06-07.

Against the Assessment Order of the Income Tax Officer Ward X(2), Chennai dated 31.03.2006 for the Assessment Year 98-99. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.M.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.T.N.Seetharaman

O R D E R

The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is less than Rs.20,00,000/-.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.

3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssk/msk To:

1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `B' Bench.

2.The Assistant Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IV Floor, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai 90.

3.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)IV, Chennai 34.

4.The Income Tax Officer, Ward X(2), Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.T.Ravikumar, Advocate, S.R.No.4692 +1cc to Mr.T.N.Seetharaman, Advocate, S.R.No.3677 Tax Case Appeal No.775 of 2010 KSJ(CO) CA(01/02/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/