S.Dhanalakshmi @ Rosaline Mary v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH Crl.O.P.No.21199 of 2019 S.Dhanalakshmi @ Rosaline Mary Represented by her Power of Attorney S.Israel Durai.

... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, S-8, Police Station, Adambakkam, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Chennai.

... Respondents (R3 Suo Motto impleaded as per order of this Court dated 06.09.2019 ) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct further investigation in Crime No.1239 of 2012 on the file of the 2nd respondent and include the names who are involved in the above crime related to the property of the petitioner and file charge sheet on the above facts and circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : M/s.Usha Ramman For Respondents: Mr.C.Iyyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3

O R D E R

The ground on which the petitioner seeks for further investigation in Crime No.1239 of 2012 filed by the second respondent herein is that though the First Information Report was registered on 21.09.2012, there was not much progress in the investigation.

2. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner had furnished further details in the complaint, the same have not been considered in right perspective.

3. Today, when the matter is called up for hearing the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the investigation in Crime No.1239 of 2012 has been transferred from the file of the second respondent herein to the Central Crime Branch, Chennai and that the Central Crime Branch shall conduct a fair and proper investigation expeditiously. The Central Crime Branch has already been suo motu impleaded as a party/respondent in this proceedings. Since the petitioner is not satisfied with the investigation conducted by the second respondent herein, as the investigation had been transferred to Central Crime Branch, the petitioner had no grievance.

4. In the light of the above observation made, the Criminal Original Petition stands closed. The third respondent / Central Crime Branch shall complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, S-8, Police Station, Adambakkam, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Chennai.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

+1cc to Mr.Usha Ramman, Advocate Sr.81346 Crl.O.P.No.21199 of 2019 ca[co] srg 01/11/2019