Satheesh @ Satheeshkumar v. The State Rep By Its,,

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 353 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.550 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were found to be played cards inside the railway premises and when the same was questioned by the defacto complainant, the petitioners had intimidated and assaulted him. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent person and due to quarrel, the defacto complainant had foisted a false case against the petitioners. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioners were found playing cards inside the railway premises and when the same was questioned, the

petitioners had assaulted the defacto complainant. He would further submit that the first petitioner has got three previous cases and there is no previous case against the second petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as far as the three previous cases are concerned, two cases were closed and for that one case, the first petitioner is regularly appearing before the Court.

6. Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judical Magistrate Court, Thiruvottiyur on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of

the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., and 5.30 pm until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

shk [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

14.09.2022 shk