Madras High CourtWP/28319/2016dismissed as infructuous

Venkatesh v. The Executive Engineer

2017-01-03Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.01.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.28319 of 2016 Venkatesh S/o Bhaskaran ..

Petitioner -vs1. The Executive Engineer (Operations and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Mayiladuthurai Nagapattinam District

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer (Operations and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Kuttalam Nagapattinam District

3. The Junior Engineer (Operations and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Kuttalam Nagapattinam District

4. Sivaprakasam S/o Thangarasu Padayachi

5. The Superintendent of Police Kuttalam Police Station Nagapattinam District (R5 suo motu impleaded vide order of Court dated 12.8.2016 in W.P.No.28319/16) ..

Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of third respondent in his proceedings: KA No.E Mi Po/E&Pa/Kutta/Ko.Pugar/No.388/15 dated 23.11.2015 and quash the same and further direct the respondents 1 to 3 to disconnect electric service connection Nos.530 007 4 and 530 007 3, as the fourth respondent is in unlawful possession of the property belonging to the petitioner.

For Petitioner :: Mr.S.Sounthar For Respondents ::

Mr.P.Gunaraj for R1 to 3 Ms.N.Alamelumangai for R4 Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate for R5

ORDER

The petitioner has come to this Court seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the Junior Engineer (Operations and Maintenance), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Kuttalam, Nagapattinam District, the third respondent herein in letter No.EMi Po/E&Pa/Kutta/Ko.Pugar/No.388/15 dated 23.11.2015, to quash the same with a further direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to disconnect the electricity service connection bearing Nos.530 007 4 and 530 007 3, as the fourth respondent is in unlawful possession of the property belonging to the petitioner.

2. When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the prayer has become infructuous and the writ petition may be dismissed.

3. Recording his statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

ss To

1. The Executive Engineer (Operations and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Mayiladuthurai Nagapattinam District

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer (Operations and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Kuttalam Nagapattinam District

3. The Junior Engineer (Operations and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Kuttalam Nagapattinam District

4. The Superintendent of Police Kuttalam Police Station Nagapattinam District +1cc to Mr.S. Sounthar, Advocate, S.R.No.425 rv(CO) md(24/01/2017) W.P.No.28319 of 2016