Periyasamy, Aged 48 Years, v. The State Rep . By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRDAS

DATE: 08..11..2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Criminal Original Petition No.24382 of 2016 Periyasamy ... Petitioner -Versus1.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thalaivasal Police Station, Salem District.

... Respondent 2.Kanagarathinam ... Proposed Respondent Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st respondent police to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members from the threat of the proposed 2nd respondent and to prevent him from disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner'd landed property.

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, APP for R1

ORDER

Seeking police protection for himself and his family members and also for his properties, the petitioner has come up with the present original petition.

2. It is seen that the petitioner seeks police protection in respect of the property for which a decree has been passed by a civil court in his favour.

3. Under the above circumstance, in the considered opinion of this court, no such direction as prayed for could be granted in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Devinder Pal Singh Bhuller and others, (2011) 14 SCC 770.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. In the result, the criminal original petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy in the manner known to law.

-s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar 1.The Inspector of Police, Thalaivasal Police Station,Salem District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court,Madras.

+1 cc to M/s.E.Kannadasan Advocate sr 64068 Crl.O.P.No.24382 of 2016 mv(co) aa14/11/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/