R Ramakrishnan, v. The State Represented By Its, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

1. R.Ramakrishnan

2. R. Prithivi Rajan

3. R. Usha

4. R Priyanka ... Petitioners Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police Paravakottai Police Station Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu Crime No.49 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioners on Anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.49 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners :

Mr. J.Kirthick Rishi For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.side)

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent 1/6

police for the offences punishable under Section 296(4), 118(1) & 351(2) of BNS 2023 in Crime No.49 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were alleged to have assaulted the defacto Complainant and her son in her house and attacked them physically. They were taken to Mannargudi Government Hospital by local residents. Based on the hospital intimation and inquiry, FIR was registered.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioners are ready to abide any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, the learned counsel prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioners entered into the house of the defacto Complainant assaulted her and her son which caused injuries to them. They were admitted in Hospital. He also submits that the injured discharged from the hospital. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to 2/6

the petitioners.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either sides, nature of allegation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvarur on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on proof of payment of deposits, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] if the petitioners fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand 3/6

automatically cancelled;

[b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [d] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police office as and when required; [f] the petitioners to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for Police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [g] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[h] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme 4/6

Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

30.07.2025 shl To

1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvarur

2. The Inspector of Police Paravakottai Police Station Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

shl 30.07.2025 6/6