V.Parimala, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P No.17314 of 2013 V.Parimala ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambattur Taluk, Ambattur.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur Collector Office, Thiruvallur.

3.The District Collector, Thiruvallur.

4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Parasuramalingeswarar Thirukoil, Iyanpuram, Chennai - 23.

.. Respondents Prayer:

The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation letter dated 19.6.2013 filed by the petitioner and further directing the 1st respondent to cancel the Patta No.16 in accordance with law.

For Petitioners: No appearance For Respondents: Mr.N.Inbanathan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.R.Mahalingam for R4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

When the case was listed for hearing on 20.06.2018 and 26.6.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambattur Taluk, Ambattur.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur Collector Office, Thiruvallur.

3.The District Collector, Thiruvallur.

4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Parasuramalingeswarar Thirukoil, Iyanpuram, Chennai - 23.

+1cc to Mr.R.Mahalingam, Advocate, S.R.No.40804 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.42334 W.P No.17314 of 2013 CS/09/07/18 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/