A.Soundararajan And Another v. Dulcie Dharmaraj And 4 Others

A.No.4776 of 2021 & A.No.4777 of 2021 in T.O.S.No.2 of 2012 A.No.4776 of 2021 & A.No.4777 of 2021 in T.O.S.No.2 of 2012 N.SESHASAYEE.J., The applications in A.No.4776 of 2021 is filed seeking leave of the Court to receive secondary evidence, and A.No.4777 of 2021 is filed to receive certain documents as additional documents and to mark the same as exhibits in T.O.S.No.2 of 2012.

2. The second respondent has filed his counter. Heard both sides. Both the applications are allowed subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility. So far as A.No.4776 of 2021 is concerned, the plaintiffs/applicants require leave of the Court to adduce secondary evidence. The rule for adducing second evidence is governed by relevant provisions of the Evidence Act, and that shall prevail. Any secondary evidence adduced is subject to Rules of Evidence as prescribed. 21.12.2021 ds (1⁄2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

A.No.4776 of 2021 & A.No.4777 of 2021 in T.O.S.No.2 of 2012 N.SESHASAYEE.J., ds A.No.4776 of 2021 & A.No.4777 of 2021 in T.O.S.No.2 of 2012 21.12.2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2