K.Subramanian v. The Dist.Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.09.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.11966 of 2004 K.Subramanian .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

2. The Block Development Officer, Kanai Panchayat Union, Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram District.

3. Velmurugan .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to refrain from digging the Agriculture lands in S.No.486/4 at Anniyur Village, Kanai Panchayat Union, Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram District and constructing a well in the said lands.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali Government Advocate (for R1) Mr.A.R.Chandrasekaran (for R2) Mr.E.Pugalendhi (for R3)

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 21.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ petition was directed to be listed 'for dismissal' on 22.09.2017. Today (22.09.2017), when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner, inspite of the matter being listed in the said https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

caption and the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner having been called twice. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VI) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar mm To

1. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

2. The Block Development Officer, Kanai Panchayat Union, Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram District.

+1cc to Government Pleader in sr.no.70630 W.P.No.11966 of 2004 RK(CO) NR 26/10/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/