← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22960/2006dismissed as infructuous

C.Chenniappan v. The Superintending

2017-11-16Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.11.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.No.22960 of 2006 C.Chenniappan ... Petitioner Vs.

The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Erode Circle, Erode, Erode District.

... Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned charge memo issued by the respondent in Charge Memo No.75 C/Ka.Kaa/2004-1 dated 27.03.2006 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mohan Raj For Respondent : Mrs.S.Thamizharasi

O R D E R

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition before this Court.

2. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dn https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Erode Circle, Erode, Erode District.

+1 cc to Mr.V.P.Raju Advocate sr 81956 W.P.No.22960 of 2006 aa13/12/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/