Balachandar P v. The State Represented By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.07.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Balachandar ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Redhills.

Chennai.

Crime No.24 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.24 of 2025 on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioner :

Mr.Baskaran Dhanakaran For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 69 and 79 of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.24 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/7

2.The case of the prosecution is that, the defacto-complainant is a divorcee and working in SS Vegetable Shop. The petitioner is the customer of the above said vegetable shop and have friendship with the defacto-complainant and they loved each other and also had physical relationship. After the defactocomplainant became pregnant and delivered a male child on 06.03.2025, he has refused to marry her and he had also questioned about the paternity of the child. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to submit himself for DNA test and in the event of confirming his paternity, he would marry the defacto-complainant. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2/7

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that petitioner is ready to co-operate with the respondent Police for DNA test, and since, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall 3/7

stand automatically cancelled;

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks; thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [d] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police and co-operate for taking samples for DNA test. [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial and he shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [f] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[g] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [h] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with 4/7

law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

29.07.2025 ep To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.2 Ponneri.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Redhills.

Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/7

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

ep 6/7

29.07.2025 7/7