Madras High CourtWA/8/2016dismissed for nonprosecution

T.S.Dhakshinamurthy, v. The Secretary

2016-01-12Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy,Honourable Mr Justice Satish K. Agnihotri3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.01.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.A.No.8 of 2016 T.S.Dhakshinamurthy ... Appellant/Petitioner Vs.

1. The Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 3.

3. The City Engineer, Works Department, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 3.

4. The Executive Engineer, Zone VI, Corporation of Chennai, No.266, T.H.Road, Chennai - 21.

5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Unit - 9, Corporation of Chennai, 4th East Cross Street, M.K.B.Nagar, Chennai - 39.

6. Pradeep Kumar Sarawagi

7. V.Baskaran

8. V.Thiyagarajan ... Respondents

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 05.11.2015 made in W.P.No.23697 of 2015. W.P.No.23697 of 2015 : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus or Direction, directing the 2nd Respondent to take necessary action on the representation dated 13.06.2015 sent by the petitioner. For Appellant :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.P.S.Sivashanmuga Sundaram, Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.R.Arunmozhi for R2 to R5

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, J.) When the matter was called in the first round, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was passed over. Again, when the matter was called in the second round, none appeared on behalf of the appellant nor was any representation made on his behalf. Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmi To