Kgr Industries, v. The Tamil Nadu Warehousing

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.01.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.A.No.80 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.990 of 2016 KGR Industries rep. by its Proprietor K.Govinda Reddy ..

Appellant/Petitioner Vs.

The Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation, A Government of Tamil Nadu Sponsored Undertaking, No.82, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai - 32 rep. by its Managing Director .. Respondent/Respondent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 22.12.2015 in W.P.No.37526 of 2015. WP.No.37526 of 2015: Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of india praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the conditions laid down in the tender duly called for by the Managing Director Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation Chennai-32 the respondent herein for the appointment of handling and transport contractors for the period of 2015-2017 for the purpose of Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation as shown in the Petition.

For Appellant ..

Mr.N.C.Ramesh, Sr. Counsel for Mr.D.Ashok Kumar For Respondent ..

Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.T.S.Murthy, Govt. Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

JUDGMENT

(delivered by SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, J.) With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ appeal is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.

2.Assailing the order dated 22 December 2015 made in W.P.No.37526 of 2015, whereby and whereunder, the learned single Judge declined to grant the relief sought for by the appellant/writ petitioner, the present appeal has been filed. 3.The sole grievance of the appellant/writ petitioner is that the appellant/writ petitioner has preferred a miscellaneous petition being M.P.No.3 of 2015, seeking to raise additional grounds and the learned single Judge, without considering the said petition, which was on record, disposed of the writ petition finally.

4.In that view of the matter, we are of the considered view that the petitioner may file a review petition raising the aforestated grounds, if so advised.

5.Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed with the aforestated liberty. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-s/dAssistant Registrar(CSII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar mmi To The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation, A Government of Tamil Nadu Sponsored Undertaking, No.82, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai - 32.

+1 cc to Mr.STS.Murthy Advocate sr.5033/16 W.A.No.80 of 2016 aa10/02/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/