← Library
Madras High CourtWP/23821/2024dismissed

S.Prabhuram v. The District Collector

2025-04-22Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-04-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Mr.S.Prabhuram Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Collector Office Of The District Collector, Coimbatore- 641 018.

2.The District Revenue Officer Collectorate, Coimbatore -641 018.

3.The Sub-Collector Office of The Sub-Collector, Pollachi.

4.The Tahsildar Office Of The Tahsildar, Anamalai-642104.

5.The Executive Office Kottur Town Panchayath,

Kottur, Malaiyandipattinam, Pollachi- 642 114.

6.The President Kottur Town Panchayath, Kottur, Malaiyandipattinam, Pollachi- 642 114.

Respondent(s) PRAYER Calling for records of the impugned notice dated 25.07.2024 vide Na.Ka. No.164/2024A issued by the 5th Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 5th respondent to remove the lock and seal from the Petitioner's E-Commerce Shop Situated at SF.No.1759/11, Ward No.12, Anagalakurichi Street, Kottur Town Panchayath, Anamalai Taluk, Coimbatore District.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.S.Nagarajan For Respondent(s):

Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh Spl Gp For R1 To 4 No Appearance R5 and R6

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Notice under Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 in proceedings dated 25.07.2024 is under Challenge in the present writ petition.

2. Pertinently, patta issued in favour of the petitioner was cancelled. The authorities found irregularities in grant of patta, and further, the constructed building is also unauthorized.

3. No writ against notice is entertainable in a routine manner unless such notice has been issued by an incompetent authority having no jurisdiction or tainted with the allegations of malafides. The petitioner, instead of producing documents before the authorities and participate in the inquiry, has chosen to file the writ petition with the apparent intention of prolonging and protracting the enforcement actions to be initiated under the relevant provisions of the Act.

4. Therefore, this court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. If the petitioner possess any document, he is at liberty to produce the same before the authorities. However, the respondents are directed to continue the enforcement actions and remove the unauthorized constructions by following the proceedings. The said exercise is directed to be completed within a period of

eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(K.RAJASEKAR J.) 22-04-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Jeni

To 1.The District Collector Office Of The District Collector, Coimbatore- 641 018.

2.The District Revenue Officer Collectorate, Coimbatore -641 018.

3.The Sub- Collector Office Of The Sub - Collector, Pollachi.

4.The Tahsildar Office Of The Tahsildar, Anamalai642104.

5.The Executive Office Kottur Town Panchayath, Kottur, Malaiyandipattinam, Pollachi- 642 114.

6.The President Kottur Town Panchayath, Kottur, Malaiyandipattinam, Pollachi- 642 114.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.

AND K.RAJASEKAR J.

Jeni 22-04-2025