← Library
Madras High CourtWP/27212/2012withdrawn dismissed

Periyannan v. The District Collector

2015-10-26Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.10.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.27212 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 1.Periyannan 2.Rajammal .. Petitioners vs.

1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem.

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Omalar Taluk, Salem District.

3. The Kottai Mariamman Koil Village Panchayat, rep. by its President, Velappagoundenpudur, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

4.Thangavel 5.Saravanan 6.S.Vennila 7.S.Selvi 8.N.Radha 9.A.Chandhirasekar 10.G.R.Rajendhiran 11.Archana Singhania 12.Rajkumar Choudhari 13.R.Thenmozhi 14.V.Sankar 15.N.Devaraj 16.K.Saisankari 17.K.Chitra 18.S.Rani 19.Seyyappan 20.M.Saravanan 21.G.Rathinavel

22.C.Alagappan 23.V.Subramaniyan 24.D.Ramanujam 25.S.Jayanthi 26.P.Thaiyalnayagi 27.S.Vani 28.S.Ramasamy 29.R.Balasubramaniyam 30.P.Ganapathy 31.P.Mahendhiran 32.R.Selvam 33.M.Pachamuthu 34.The Sub Registrar, Sub Register Office, Opp.Govt Hospital, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. .. Respondents (R6 to R34 impleaded as per order dated 24.10.2013 in Mp.1/2013 in WP.27212/12) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the respondents 4 and 5 in compliance with Section 47A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 and further direct the respondents 4 and 5 to restore the lands in S.F.No.94/2B measuring an extent of 0.63 acres and S.F.Nos.92/1 measuring an extent of 1.65 cents and 100/1 measuring an extent of 0.761⁄2 cents all situate in Omalur Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District to its original wet land nature.

For petitioners : Mr.Su.Srinivasan For respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.R.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader For 3rd respondent : Mr.V.Shanmugasundar For 4th and 5th : Ms.R.Meenal Respondents

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners had submitted that the Writ Petition may be dismissed, as withdrawn. He had also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition stands dismissed, as withdrawn. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2012 is closed.

sd/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CCC) /TRUE COPY/ UB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR asvm To

1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem.

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Omalar Taluk, Salem District.

3. The President, The Kottai Mariamman Koil Village Panchayat, Velappagoundenpudur, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

4.The Sub Registrar, Sub Register Office, Opp.Govt Hospital, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

+1 CC to Govt.Pleader. SR.NO.58087 W.P.No.27212 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 CO-VD JD 06/11/2015