Devagi v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.08.2023

CORAM

MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE and W.M.P.No.22829 of 2023 Devagi ... Petitioner Vs.

The Tahsildar Aminjikarai Taluk Office Aminjikarai, Chennai ... Respondent PRAYER: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed in TNCIT000000009109722 date (not known) by the respondent and quash the same consequently directing the respondent to issue the legal heir certificate to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Pavel For Respondent : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government Advocate 1/4

ORDER

By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2.The petitioner's application for issuance of a legal heir certificate has been rejected. The status obtained from the e-portal only shows that it has been rejected based on Revenue Inspector's enquiry. Now, unless the petitioner is informed what this report is all about, he may not even able to project a case for his right to obtain the legal heir certificate. 3.Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik, the learned Government Advocate has taken notice for the respondent.

4.This Court now directs the respondent to provide the petitioner with a copy of the report of the Revenue Inspector within a period of two (2) weeks from today. 5.The petitioner is directed to work out his remedy after perusing the said report. 2/4

6.Learned Government Advocate also informed the Court that the Tahsildar, Egmore is a jurisdictional Tahsildar for the purpose. 7.This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

08.08.2023 kas Index : Yes / No To The Tahsildar Aminjikarai Taluk Office Aminjikarai, Chennai 3/4

N.SESHASAYEE, J.

kas and W.M.P.No.22829 of 2023 08.08.2023 4/4