R. Elanchezhian v. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.10.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.No.23027 of 2006 R. Elanchezhian ... Petitioner Vs.

1) Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Rep by its Chairman, No.76, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032

2) Mrs.D. Mohanambigai, Environmental Scientist, Advance Environmental Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai 625 008 ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the concerned records from the first respondent, quash the order of the first respondent dated 12.07.2006 bearing Ref No.Per/P1/21952/2006 in so far as transferring the services of the petitioner from Advanced Environmental Laboratory, Salem to District Environmental Laboratory, Tirupur and transferring the second respondent from District Environmental Laboratory, Madurai to Advanced Environmental Laboratory, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr. Balan Haridas For R1 : Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar For R2 : R2 disd., vide Court Order dated 12.01.2012.

O R D E R

The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking to call for the concerned records from the first respondent and quash the order of the first respondent dated 12.07.2006 bearing Ref No.Per/P1/21952/2006 in so far as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

transferring the services of the petitioner from Advanced Environmental Laboratory, Salem to District Environmental Laboratory, Tirupur and transferring the second respondent from District Environmental Laboratory, Madurai to Advanced Environmental Laboratory, Salem.

2. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was promoted as Deputy Chief Environmental Engineer and he has been retained at Salem itself. In view of the developments which took place during the pendency of the writ petition, the issue originally raised in the writ petition does not survive and considering the same, the writ petition may be closed.

3. Accordingly, the submission made by the learned counsel representing the first respondent is recorded and the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sts To

1) The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No.76, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 +1cc to Mr. Advocate, S.R.No. 76542/17 +1cc to Mr. Advocate, S.R.No. 77415/17 Order in W.P.No.23027 of 2006 BR (CO) TR(23/11/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/