K.Nagarajan (A1) v. The State Rep By
V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
The Petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the Respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act 2002, in Crime No.181 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the Petitioners and the Defacto complainant are neighbours and on 15.07.2023 the Petitioners were involved in a wordy quarrel with the Defacto complainant. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned Counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Petitioners daughter Ajitha was severely attacked by the Defacto complainant and his family members. Thereafter FIR has been registered in Crime No.180 of 2023 against the Defacto complainant. To take revenge, the Defacto Complainant filed false complaint against the Petitioners. Hence, the learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the Respondent vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners. 5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by 1/ 4
the learned counsel on either sides and the nature and gravity of the alleged offences, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners with certain conditions.
7.Accordingly, the Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Additional Mahila Court, Coimbatore, on condition that the Petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the Petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the Petitioners shall report before the Respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required; [c] the Petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the Petitioners shall not abscond either during 2/ 4
investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
14.08.2023 sai/spp 3/ 4
V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
spp 14.08.2023 4/ 4