Tata Capital Ltd v. Chandrasekaran M And Another
Arb Appln NO. 463 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb Appln No. 463 of 2024 Tata Capital Ltd By its Legal Manager D Kalaiarasan Having its office at 1st Floor Centennial Square 6A Dr Ambedkar Salai Kodambakkam Chennai 600 024 Appellant(s) Vs Chandrasekaran M and another By its Legal Manager D Kalaiarasan Having its office at 1st Floor Centennial Square 6A Dr Ambedkar Salai Kodambakkam Chennai 600 0241211 D, Pappankulam, Near Co Operative Society, Coimbatore 642 204. and another Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.N.K.Vanan For Respondent(s):
Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham Advocate Commissioner
ORDER
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the vehicle still remains untraceable and therefore, the Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court could not execute the warrant of commission. She seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the application, however, with liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner once again, if the vehicle is traceable. Learned counsel for the applicant also submitted that the initial remuneration has already been paid to the Advocate Commissioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.
vsi
2. Accordingly, this Application is dismissed as withdrawn and liberty as sought for by the applicant is granted. This Court, while deciding the fresh application to be filed by the applicant seeking for the very same relief shall consider retaining the same Advocate Commissioner, since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner. 17-02-2025 vsi To
1. Chandrasekaran M and another By its Legal Manager D Kalaiarasan Having its office at 1st Floor Centennial Square 6A Dr Ambedkar Salai Kodambakkam Chennai 600 0241211 D, Pappankulam, Near Co Operative Society, Coimbatore 642 204.
2. Mahalingam K Coimbatore Arb Appln No. 463 of 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis