← Library
Madras High CourtWP/24163/2019disposed of

K.Ganapathi v. The Executive Engineer

2019-08-22Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.08.2019 CORAM :

The Hon'ble Mrs.VIJAYA K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.24163 of 2019 K.Ganapathi .. Petitioner -vs1.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Department, 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Department, Rasipuram, Salem District.

3.The Divisional Engineer, Building and Maintenance, Highways Department, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 5.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Building and Maintenance, Highways Department, Namakkam District.

6.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem,

7.The Tahsildar, Salem South, 8.The Tahsildar, 9.The Block Development Officer, Mallasamudram, .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.12.2018 in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sudhakaran For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Government Pleader (i/c)

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard Mr.J.Sudhakaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, learned Government Pleader (i/c) for the respondents.

2. The case of the petitioner is that there is a canal in Survey Nos.128, 130, 133, 134, 138, 106/3, 118/4, 131/8, 133/7,6, 134/4,5,6, 132/3,5,6 and 138/2B situate in Chennagiri Village, Salem South Taluk, Salem District, through which water flows from Minnakkal lake to Thirumanimutharu river at Sappaiyapuram, Thiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. In the said canal, there is blockage of water flow.

3. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the said blockage is not man-made and he submitted that it is necessary to clean up the said canal so that water can flow freely. The petitioner has preferred a representation dated 11.12.2018 to respondent No.4 i.e., the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchengode, Namakkal District, in relation to removal of the said blockage in the canal. The prayer of the petitioner is that the said representation be disposed of at the earliest.

4. The learned Government Pleader (i/c) stated that respondent No.1 will consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 11.12.2018, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The said statement of the learned Government Pleader (i/c) is recorded.

5. In view of the statement made by the learned Government Pleader (i/c), no further orders are necessary. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bbr To:

1.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Department, 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Department, Rasipuram, Salem District.

3.The Divisional Engineer, Building and Maintenance, Highways Department, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 5.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Building and Maintenance, Highways Department, Namakkam District.

6.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem, Salem District.

7.The Tahsildar, Salem South, Salem District.

8.The Tahsildar, 9.The Block Development Officer, Mallasamudram, Namakkal District.

+1cc to Mr.J.Sudhakaran, Advocate sr.72039 W.P.No.24163 of 2019 sj(co) nr 26/07/2019