A.Rajasekaran v. The Deputy Inspector General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :14.11.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.27890 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 A.Rajasekaran ..Petitioner vs 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem Range, Salem.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

.. Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proceeding number C.No.B2/435/6713/2013 dated 1.10.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents to regularise the period of suspension with all monetary and service benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan Senior Counsel for M/s.M.Srividhya For Respondents: Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Government Advocate

O R D E R

The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that the impugned order of suspension was issued when the writ petitioner was in service. However, the writ petitioner had attained the age of superannuation and retired from service.

2.Thus, no further adjudication is required on the grounds raised in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

stands closed. However, there shall be no orders as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem Range, Salem.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

+1cc to Mr.M.Srividya, Advocate SR.No.81170 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.81516 W.P.No.27890 of 2013 (CO) GN(04/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/