Vimala v. Iop, Salem

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.09.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.OP.No.21748 of 2022 Vimala ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Mallur Police Station, Salem District.

(Crime No.253/2022).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.253 of 2022 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Mallur Police Station, Salem District. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vasudevan For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.08.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 4(l)(a) & 4(1-A) of Tamilnadu Prohibition Act, in Crime No.253 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 18.08.2022, when the police were on Patrol duty, the petitioner was found in possession of 27 Express Brandy bottles and they were seized by the respondent police. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner in violation of Liquor Rules was found in possession of 27 Express Brandy bottles and they were seized by 2/6

the respondent police. He would also submit that there are no previous cases as against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both the learned counsel and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel and also the fact that there are no previous cases as against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Salem and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and 3/6

Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

09.09.2022 rgi 4/6

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Salem.

2. The Inspector of Police, Mallur Police Station, Salem District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Salem.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA., J.

rgi 09.09.2022 6/6