Jamia Masjid Sunnath Val v. The Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.01.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.No.29158 of 2016 and WMP.No.25211 of 2016 ---- Jamia Masjid Sunnath Val Jamath, V.Kalathur, Perambalur District rep. by its President T.S.E. Liaquet Ali ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur.

3. Tahsildar, Veppanthattai Taluk, Veppanthattai, Perambalur District.

4. M.Ramasamy Udayar ... Respondents R-4 impleaded as per the order dated 11.01.2017 in WMP.No.28435/2016 in WP.29158/2016 Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 09.03.2016, till then not to permit any person to put up any construction in the name of the temple in the Natham Poramboke land in S.No.119/1 in V.Kalathur Village to the extent of 0.30.0 hectares. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.S.Rajeswaran, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 09.03.2016 and till then, not to permit any person to put up any construction in the name of the temple in the Natham Poramboke https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

land in S.No.119/1 in V.Kalathur Village to the extent of 0.30.0 hectares.

2.

Today, when the matter is called, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 filed a counter affidavit of the 3rd respondent thereby rejecting the claim of the petitioner in detail and the same is put on record. 3.

In view of the above, considering the fact that the writ petition is filed seeking only a limited prayer to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 09.03.2016 and also the fact that the claim of the petitioner was rejected by the 3rd respondent by filing a detailed counter, nothing survives in the writ petition.

4.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar tsi To

1. The Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur.

3. Tahsildar, Veppanthattai Taluk, Veppanthattai, Perambalur District.

+1 cc to the Government Pleader High Court Madras sr 3039 +1 cc to M/s.S.Doraisamy Advocate sr 3115 +1 cc to M/s.C.S.Associates sr 3187 W.P.No.29158 of 2016 ss(co) aa10/02/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/