Rajalakshmi Ammal, v. Kilapalur Sri Gopalakrishnan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.10.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN Second Appeal No.880 of 2001 Rajalakshmi Ammal .. Appellant/Appellant/ Defendant Vs.

Kilapalur Sri Gopalakrishnan Bajanai Madam by its Trustees:- 1.Rengaraj 2.Sundararaj 3.Duraisamy 4.Sri Ramulu 5.Krishnan .. Respondents/Respondent/ Plaintiffs Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.01.1999 made in A.S.No.207 of 1993 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur, upholding the Judgment and Decree dated 19.07.1993 made in O.S.No.134 of 1990 on the file of District Munsif Court, Ariyalur.

For Appellant :No appearance For Respondents:Mr.G.Perumal

JUDGMENT

This matter was listed on 26.10.2017 and on that day, there was no representation for both sides. Accordingly, Registry was directed to list the matter today (27.10.2017) under the caption "for dismissal".

2. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant and counsel for the respondents present. Appellant called absent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. It is found that though the sole appellant and one of the respondents reported died long back and steps have not been taken to bring the Legal Representatives of the deceased appellant and one of the respondents on record. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as abated with costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.

2.The District Munsif Court, Ariyalur.

S.A. No.880 of 2001 GJ(CO) EU(11/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/