V.Dhanasekar, v. The Inspector General Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.09.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.17751 of 2012 V.Dhanasekar .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

2. The Sub Registrar, Madhavaram, Chennai.

.. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to release the General Power of Attorney dated 11.04.2012 registered with the second respondent in P 201200234 dated 11.04.2012 within a time bound period.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali Government Advocate

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 20.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ petition was directed to be listed 'for dismissal' on 21.09.2017. Today (21.09.2017), when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner, inspite of the matter being listed in the said caption and the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner having been called twice. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

-sd/- Assistant Registrar / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

mm To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

2. The Sub Registrar, Madhavaram, Chennai.

+1 cc to Government Pleader SR.NO. 70794/2017 Order in W.P.No.17751 of 2012 RD 11/10/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/