K.P.Natarajan, v. The Transport Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.08.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.27978 of 2010 and MP.Nos.2 & 3 of 2010 K.P.Natarajan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Transport Commissioner Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2. The Regional Transport Officer, Salem (West), Salem.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with the memo of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.A3/57728/2010 dated 2.11.2010 directing the second respondent to collect the tax for the vehicle TN 30 AJ 2464 on the basis of the floor area for the period from 1-10-2009 to 30.09.2010, quash the same and direct the respondents to issue the tax clearance certificate in respect of the bus forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Natesan For R1 & R2 : Mr.J.Ramesh, AGP

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rk To

1. The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2. The Regional Transport Officer, Salem (West), Salem.

+ 1 cc to Government Pleader SR.53228 W.P.No.27978 of 2010 PVS(CO) EU(23/10/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/