Gurleen Singh v. Karthik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P No.15416 of 2025 Mr.Gurleen Singh The Branch Manager, Axis Bank, Punjab, Ludhiana, Mundian Kalan Branch Punjab - 141015 ... Petitioner
Versus
1.Karthik 2.The State rep.by Inspector of Police, CCD-I, Avadi Police Station CSR - 3 of 2023 ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C.,), to set aside the impugned order dated 21.1.2025 in C.M.P.No.4537/2024 in C.S.R.No.3/23 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate-1, Poonamallee as devoid of merit.
For Petitioner : M/s. M.R. Uma Vijayan For Respondents : Mr. A. Gopinath, (for R2) Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
O R D E R
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21.1.2025 in C.M.P.No.4537 of 2024 in C.S.R.No.3 of 2023 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate-1, Poonamallee.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the learned Magistrate, without issuing notice to the petitioner on the petition filed by the first respondent, passed an order directing the petitioner to disburse the amount in favour of the first respondent from the account of the accused. He further submitted that the petitioner is receiving various Court orders across India directing to disburse the amounts lying in the account of the accused, to the victims. Once the
amount is disbursed from the account of the accused in compliance with one such order, the petitioner would be unable to comply with any subsequent order from any other Court pertaining to the same account. Therefore, if any notice served on the petitioner, they would have an opportunity to place their explanation before the concerned Court. He also relied upon the Judgement of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Criminal Petition No.11203 of 2024 dated 11.11.2024 in the case of AXIS Bank Ltd, represented by its Branch Head, Mr.Zafeer K.M Vs. The State of Karnataka, wherein the Court passed the following order :- "(i) Criminal Petition is allowed.
(ii) The order dated 31.07.2024, passed by the XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru in Cr.No.25/2024 is hereby set aside. (iii) Matter is remanded to XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, to reconsider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C afresh, after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
(iv) Till the application is disposed of, the petitioner/bank is restrained from releasing the
money in favour of any person from the subject account.
(v) In the light of the issue pending for such consideration, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to dispose the application so filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order."
4. It is seen that the first respondent is the victim of the online fraud committed by the accused. Based on the complaint, the second respondent registered a First Information Report. Pursuant to the registration of the FIR, the bank accounts of the accused were frozen. Subsequent to the freezing of the accounts of the accused, the first respondent filed an application in C.M.P.No.4537 of 2024 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee, under Section 503 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, (BNSS), 2023, seeking to return his amount lying in the accused's bank account to the victim's account. Upon perusal of such application, the learned Magistrate, allowed the application on 21.01.2025 filed by the first respondent.
.
5. Admittedly, the amount has been transferred only from the bank account of the accused. In fact, as directed by the police, the petitioner has frozen the account of the accused. Accordingly, the learned Magistrate passed order directing the transfer of the amount from the account of the accused to the victim. The petitioner, being the bank, has to comply with the said direction.
6. The only grievance of the petitioner is that, if multiple orders are passed with similar directions, the petitioner may not be in a position to comply with all of the orders. It is made clear that the petitioner shall act on a "first come first serve" basis, i.e., the order first received from the competent Court shall be complied with first. After compliance with the initial order, if no funds remain in the accused's account, the petitioner shall not be held responsible for non-compliance with subsequent orders, as no amount would be available for disbursement.
7. In view of the above, this Court does not find any infirmity or illegality in the order dated 21.01.2025 passed in C.M.P.No.4537 of 2024 in C.S.R.No.3 of 2023 by the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee, and the same is hereby confirmed.
8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 12.08.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order ssd To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee
2. The State rep.by Inspector of Police, CCD-I, Avadi Police Station 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
ssd and Crl.M.P No.15416 of 2025 12.08.2025